- monthly subscription or
- one time payment
- cancelable any time

"Tell the chef, the beer is on me."

~~~

Hey everyone ;)

I thought it would be nice to have a place where we could collect all the great stuff that's circling around on the soups, so I made this group. Join + post stuff you like :)

Dearest contributors, just a gentle reminder: before you post, please take the time to check the first 1-2 screens of atheism.soup.io if it has already been posted recently. Less redundancy = more room for awesomeness!

Reposted from kwasmilosz

Reposted from kwasmilosz

Typical Theist Argument: "The odds of the universe being the way it is by chance are only 1: [really huge number], ergo, it must have been created by a deity!"

Atheism Resource:

Allow me to refute this argument by way of demonstration: Suppose that I took a deck of cards, shuffled it well, and then spread the cards out, face up on the table. In fact, I will do just that, and post a picture of the outcome so we can both be on the same page.

Take a look at this deck of 54 cards (52 plus the Jokers). Are you particularly awestruck by the ordering of those cards? My guess is that you probably are not. But do you know what the odds of getting all 54 cards in that exact order are? 1: 2*10^71.

To write it out longhand, the odds are 1:230,843,697,339,241,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000

So why did you not find anything impressive in the ordering of these cards despite the nigh impossible odds? The answer is, quite simply, that each and every one of those 2*10^71 is equally probable, so it should cause no surprise that one of them turned up.

Now let's turn the clock back and do the same thing with just a minor tweak: Let's suppose that I shuffled the deck of cards and then I predicted the exact order of all 54 cards in that deck. Suppose that we then we spread the cards out on the table and found that my prediction was exactly correct. Under those circumstances, I expect that you would be (appropriately) awestruck about the ordering of the cards.

So what is different about these two situations? Once again, the answer is quite simple: In the first scenario, we were not seeking to get any particular ordering of the cards. Each possible permutation was as likely as any other, and there was no one permutation that we were actively seeking to achieve. In the second scenario, however, my act of predicting created a targeted outcome. By predicting the order of all 54 cards, I took one of those 2*10^71 possible outcomes, and established it as the one and only outcome that I was attempting to achieve.

In the same way, saying "the odds of the universe being the way that it is are minuscule" is only impressive if one accepts the premise that there was a being who pre-existed the creation of the universe, and who specifically intended that the universe should be as it is, as opposed to any of the near-infinite number of other possible ways that it could have been, which is exactly the point in want of proving!

If one does not assume the existence of a deity as a premise (which one cannot, if one intends for the argument to prove the existence of a deity), one must accept that every possible way that the universe could be is equally likely, and that the universe being the way that it is is no more unlikely than any other possible way that it could have been.

TL;DR: Looking at the odds of the universe being as it is, and concluding that a deity must exist is simply a matter of "begging the question" (taking the conclusion that one intends to prove, and including it as a premise of ones argument).

Reposted from swissfondue-interim

Reposted from swissfondue-interim

Reposted from swissfondue-interim

Reposted from swissfondue-interim

Reposted from swissfondue-interim

I found this little gem while scrolling through my facebook feed. Unfortunately, I couldn't screen cap the whole thread as most of it disappeared almost immediately. But I got the exciting bit at the end.

To provide context, the atheist in the discussion had been repeatedly referring to "the Christian god" by his proper name "Yhwh", and apparently the Christian was not understanding what was happening, leading to what we see below.

Atheism Resource

Reposted from swissfondue-interim

Reposted from swissfondue-interim

Reposted from swissfondue-interim

Reposted from kwasmilosz

Reposted from swissfondue-interim

Reposted from swissfondue-interim

Reposted from swissfondue-interim

Reposted from swissfondue-interim

Maybe Soup is currently being updated? I'll try again automatically in a few seconds...

You've reached the end.

USD 4

- monthly subscription or
- one time payment
- cancelable any time

"Tell the chef, the beer is on me."

USD 35

- yearly subscription or
- one time payment
- cancelable any time

"Basically the price of a night on the town!"

USD 199.99999...

- lifetime subscription
- one time payment
limm→∞134m=0 !

"I'd love to help kickstart continued development! And 0 EUR/month really does make fiscal sense too... maybe I'll even get a shirt?" (there will be limited edition shirts for two and other goodies for each supporter as soon as we sold the 200)

*No ads*displayed on the blog- ... or to the blogs user
*Exclusive servers*for faster access in peak times, for you*and*your visitors*Reliable feed imports*with shorter intervals!*Priority support*and feedback!- Magical
*feature suggestion powers* *100%*of the revenue will go into development- PLUS: you're helping to develop
*a user oriented platform*!